![]() However, the cost of green hydrogen will come at a premium compared to hydrogen from an existing plant, like a steam methane reformer. ![]() This can be achieved using an electrolyzer and electricity from a renewable source (solar PV, wind turbine etc.). For truly sustainable, zero-carbon mobility, the hydrogen used to refuel FCEVs needs to come from renewable sources (green hydrogen). There is already a very well-established hydrogen market, but 96% of all hydrogen produced is derived from fossil fuels (brown hydrogen), the feedstocks being natural gas, liquid hydrocarbons and coal. EV charging stations are relatively inexpensive, whereas a hydrogen refueling station can cost more than US$3 million. Hydrogen refueling stations are typically quite large and oftentimes need dedicated sites. OEMs are currently defining the early adopter markets, and this is where hydrogen refueling stations will be deployed. To date, there are approximately 100-plus public hydrogen refueling stations globally. While FCEVs have the advantage of short refueling times and long range, there is still the problem of hydrogen refueling infrastructure. If the FCEV market has not reached this stage in the next 20-25 years (i.e., moved past the early adopter phase), then FCEVs will remain only in niche applications, IHS suggests. Until this happens, the FCEV market has a window of opportunity to establish itself as a serious contender in long term zero-carbon mobility. Although hydrogen has the advantage in terms of refueling times and range, battery technology is catching up, IHS said. However, battery technology is improving each year, with the cost ($/kWh) decreasing, while energy density increases. Most BEVs on the road today do not have these advantages. Ben Scott, senior analyst with IHS AutomotiveĬurrent generation FCEVs share similar benefits to conventional cars short refueling times and long range.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |